Table 2: Determination of the stoichiometric ratio using conductivity
|
Test Tube |
Volume of Ag+ (mL) |
Volume of Bn- (mL) |
Volume Ratio Ag+:Bn- |
Likely Stoichiometric Ratio |
Conductivity (mS) |
|
1 |
2.00 |
8.00 |
1:4 |
1:4 |
1799 |
|
2 |
2.50 |
7.50 |
1:3 |
1:3 |
1863 |
|
3 |
3.00 |
7.00 |
1:2.33 |
1:2 |
1508 |
|
4 |
4.00 |
6.00 |
1:1.5 |
2:3 |
836 |
|
5 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
1:1 |
1:1 |
601 |
|
6 |
6.00 |
4.00 |
1.5:1 |
3:2 |
592 |
|
7 |
7.00 |
3.00 |
2.33:1 |
2:1 |
788 |
|
8 |
7.50 |
2.50 |
3:1 |
3:1 |
518 |
|
9 |
8.00 |
2.00 |
4:1 |
4:1 |
464 |
The table above shows our recorded conductivity readings
Table 1: Determination of the stoichiometric ratio using conductivity
|
Test Tube |
Volume of Ag+ (mL) |
Volume of Bn- (mL) |
Volume Ratio Ag+:Bn- |
Likely Stoichiometric Ratio |
Conductivity (mS) |
|
1 |
2.00 |
8.00 |
1:4 |
1:4 |
2545 |
|
2 |
2.50 |
7.50 |
1:3 |
1:3 |
2134 |
|
3 |
3.00 |
7.00 |
1:2.33 |
1:2 |
1876 |
|
4 |
4.00 |
6.00 |
1:1.5 |
2:3 |
1544 |
|
5 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
1:1 |
1:1 |
1265 |
|
6 |
6.00 |
4.00 |
1.5:1 |
3:2 |
987 |
|
7 |
7.00 |
3.00 |
2.33:1 |
2:1 |
544 |
|
8 |
7.50 |
2.50 |
3:1 |
3:1 |
125 |
|
9 |
8.00 |
2.00 |
4:1 |
4:1 |
899 |
The table above shows the sample conductivity measurements